top of page

Ordering

NAOMI M ROMERO-TORRES

Harmony and fragmentation are two contrasting concepts in architecture that have been explored by architects throughout history.



Harmony refers to the state of balance, coherence, and unity that can be achieved within a building or a group of buildings. It can be achieved through the use of symmetry, proportion, repetition, and other elements of design. Harmony in architecture can create a sense of tranquility, order, and beauty.


On the other hand, fragmentation refers to the intentional breaking up of a building or a group of buildings into smaller parts or pieces. Fragmentation can be achieved through the use of asymmetry, irregularity, and other elements of design that create a sense of disunity or disconnection. Fragmentation in architecture can create a sense of complexity, dynamism, and even chaos.


Both harmony and fragmentation can be used in architecture to achieve different aesthetic and functional goals. For example, harmony may be used in the design of a building that is meant to convey a sense of stability, while fragmentation may be used in the design of a building that is meant to convey a sense of movement or change. Ultimately, the choice between harmony and fragmentation in architecture depends on the architect's vision, the context of the building, and the intended experience of the user.


Comments


bottom of page